new | leaderboard | predictions | submit | about

New drafts — newest first

Drafts other people scored. The “predicted N points” is the model’s best guess for how that post would have done if published right now — not a real HN vote count.

1.		Show HN: Fairvisor — rate limits for APIs without a shared store
		predicted 7 points by anon \| 0 comments

2.		Show HN: Fairvisor — rate limits without global state
		predicted 5 points by anon \| 0 comments

3.		Show HN: Fairvisor — rate limits without a shared counter
		predicted 6 points by anon \| 0 comments

4.		Show HN: Fairvisor — rate limits for APIs without a global counter
		predicted 6 points by anon \| 0 comments

5.		Show HN: Fairvisor — rate limits for APIs without a distributed counter
		predicted 7 points by anon \| 0 comments

6.		Show HN: Fairvisor — rate limits for APIs without a shared counter
		predicted 7 points by anon \| 0 comments

7.		Show HN: Fairvisor — rate limits for APIs without a central counter
		predicted 7 points by anon \| 0 comments

8.		Show HN: Fairvisor — fair API limits without global state
		predicted 5 points by anon \| 0 comments

9.		Show HN: Fairvisor — request limits for APIs without global state
		predicted 6 points by anon \| 0 comments

10.		Show HN: Fairvisor — traffic limits for APIs without a global coordinator
		predicted 6 points by anon \| 0 comments

11.		Show HN: Fairvisor — traffic limits for APIs without global state
		predicted 6 points by anon \| 0 comments

12.		Show HN: Fairvisor — rate limiting for APIs without global state
		predicted 6 points by anon \| 0 comments

13.		Show HN: Fairvisor — traffic control for APIs without global state
		predicted 6 points by anon \| 0 comments

14.		Show HN: Fairvisor — traffic control for APIs without a shared counter
		predicted 7 points by anon \| 0 comments

15.		Show HN: Fairvisor — traffic control for APIs, locally
		predicted 5 points by anon \| 0 comments

16.		Show HN: Fairvisor — local traffic control for APIs
		predicted 5 points by anon \| 0 comments

17.		Show HN: Fairvisor — a single policy for API limits
		predicted 4 points by anon \| 0 comments

18.		Show HN: Fairvisor — one place for API traffic limits
		predicted 4 points by anon \| 0 comments

19.		Show HN: Fairvisor — local budgets for APIs
		predicted 4 points by anon \| 0 comments

20.		Show HN: Fairvisor — fair admission for API traffic
		predicted 4 points by anon \| 0 comments

21.		Show HN: Fairvisor — fair traffic limits for APIs
		predicted 4 points by anon \| 0 comments

22.		Show HN: Fairvisor — consistent API limits across services
		predicted 4 points by anon \| 0 comments

23.		Show HN: Fairvisor — one policy engine for local API enforcement
		predicted 4 points by anon \| 0 comments

24.		Show HN: Fairvisor — fair API limits without shared state
		predicted 4 points by anon \| 0 comments

25.		Show HN: Fairvisor — make API limits fair
		predicted 4 points by anon \| 0 comments

26.		Show HN: Fairvisor — an admission engine for local API limits
		predicted 4 points by anon \| 0 comments

27.		Show HN: Fairvisor — one policy for API limits
		predicted 4 points by anon \| 0 comments

28.		Show HN: Fairvisor — a local-first policy engine for API limits
		predicted 4 points by anon \| 0 comments

29.		Show HN: Fairvisor — local admission decisions for API traffic
		predicted 4 points by anon \| 0 comments

30.		Show HN: Fairvisor — fairness-aware API limits
		predicted 3 points by anon \| 0 comments

older →

ForesynWanna keep in touch?

Built this solo over a weekend. Soft-launching before the HN post on Monday. If you scored a draft and the prediction either nailed it or whiffed, I want to know.

→ DM @crimeacs on Telegram — fastest way to reach me
→ Connect on LinkedIn — Artemii Novoselov

What is this? · foresyn.ai

Not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator. A Foresyn project. Predicted scores are model output, not real votes.