Show HN: Agentiqa – we automate the 70% of AI coding that isn't writing code (agentiqa.com)
by anon | permalink
26/ 99 viralityNiche, low traction
edit & rescore →
12 HN points · front-page probability 31%
p10 · 3p90 · 302
The model already found titles that score higher. Try one.
Hey HN. Coding agents write code fast. Nobody verifies it works. We use Cursor and Claude Code daily. The pattern is always the same: code passes CI, types check, linting clean – but the app breaks in the browser. Auth flows fail silently. Modals don't close. MetaMask popups don't connect. CSS overlaps in production. CI was built for human-written code at human speed. Agentic development generates 10x more code, 10x more PRs, and CI catches maybe 20% of the real issues. The rest – visual regressions, broken user flows, state bugs, wallet interactions – only show up when someone actually uses the app. Agentiqa is the verification layer for this era. An AI QA agent that tests your app the way a user would: in a real browser, on mobile, through Web3 wallet flows. No test scripts. Give it a URL, it explores autonomously using vision models, generates a test plan from what it sees, executes in Playwright, and reports what's broken with screenshots and repro steps. What we cover: web apps, mobile (responsive + native), and DeFi/Web3 (MetaMask, WalletConnect, tx signing – nobody else does this end-to-end). When the UI changes, the agent adapts because it understands intent, not selectors. 2 founders, 6 months, 185 users, free tier. Built for teams shipping with coding agents. What are we missing?
ForesynWanna keep in touch?
Built this solo over a weekend. Soft-launching before the HN post on Monday. If you scored a draft and the prediction either nailed it or whiffed, I want to know.
DM @crimeacs on Telegram — fastest way to reach me
Connect on LinkedIn — Artemii Novoselov
Edit & re-score